If the artists of the Renaissance or the Harlem Renaissance, or even the young genius minds we celebrate today more that when they were alive like, Andy Warhol and Jackson Pollack, made art knowing that it would sprout monetary means much larger that they could ever imagined on a single painting? Do you think that they would have altered their vision in some way? Would they have saw their art as something more commercially viable than an expression of their artistic visions or an avenue for their passions or emotions to travel through? It’s a valid question. It’s like with any other art form in entertainment or leisure. If they all knew it would make them millions of dollars beforehand would they have said, ” Well if this is going to make me this famous, I need something more grand, something that says $106.5 million dollars.” Those probably would have been the words of a young Picasso during the time he was painting Nude, Green Leaves and Bust in 1932. Earlier this week that same painting was sold for that exact amount in an auction and is now the world’s most expensive painting.
It’s astonishing to think one painting could be worth so much. It is a Picasso, and he is respected as one of history’s greatest artists. I just find it fascinating that most fine artists who begin to paint, merely for the love and the hope that someone out there will appreciate and connect to their vision, never know that it can one day return them means that they, and I guarantee, never expected to be. In some way it beings to reshape the way we think of the phrase “struggling artist.” Then, most of them perish and tumble into the category of “they never miss you until your dead and gone” and become one of the most respected figures in history. True genius’ are never realized until the lay in the coffin. I’ve always wondered why that is. It presents itself to me how many followers we have in our society. Most of the time it takes just one person to co-sign something whether it be good or bad, then rave about it, and soon enough the rest of the world is in agreement. Here’s a simple test. Next time you are in a class or a seminar and the speaker finishes his lecture and asks, “Are there any questions?” I promise you at first no one will raise thier hand, even if they do have a question. But, you be that brave soul and ask a question, watch how many people start to raise thier hand after you. Some of it is breaking the ice, and some part of it is the others joining in on “Well, if everyone else is asking a question, I might as well ask one too.” It’s kind of sad that’s how our socitey works.
To sort of answer my own qestion on how artists would approach their work if they knew they could make millions of dollars on thier art before they even dive into the acrylics, I can parallel today’s entertainment industry. Divide a large portion of actors, musicians, and other entertainers who pursue their crafts for reasons of vanity and money simply because it’s been presented to them that, this is what you can have if you do this. Then all focus on art is long gone out the window and we have a group of artist trying to get rich by making the kind of trivial art they know will strike them oil. It’s an unfortunate truth.
In some way I kind of feel sorry for Picasso’s estate because I wonder if any of that money will be returned. It’s sort of like music artists who don’t make a dime on most of their royalties, instead it’s funneled back into the record labels, through devious schemes. “So sad, too bad,” is what they probably say.
Pay attention young artists, this is what a hundred million dollar painting looks like. I’m sure you can make one too. Just paint by numbers.
Albeit, it is a really beautiful painting.
Pablo Picasso
Nude, Green Leaves and Bust (1932)
Oil on canvas